Loading
We make advocacy simple for you Home | For lawyers | Contact Us |               | info@easyadvocacy.com

SECTION 161 CrPC - Code of Criminal Procedure - Examination of witnesses by police


(1) Any police officer making an investigation under this Chapter, or any police officer not below such rank as the State Government may, by general or special order, prescribe in this behalf, acting on the requisition of such officer, may examine orally any person supposed to be acquainted with the facts and circumstances of the case

(2) Such person shall be bound to answer truly all questions relating to such case put to him by such officer, other than questions the answers to which would have a tendency to expose him to a criminal charge or to a penalty or forfeiture

(3) The police officer may reduce into writing any statement made to him in the course of an examination under this section; and if he does so, he shall make a separate and true record of the statement of each such person whose statement he records

Comments

(i) The value of prompt interrogation of a witness during investigation cannot be over emphasised because the same eliminates to a very large extent, the possibility of an adulterated occurrence creeping in the testimony of a witness; State of Maharashtra v Joseph Mingal Koli, (1997) 2 Crimes 228 (Bom)

(ii) Investigating officer has to perform his duties with the sole object of investigating the allegations and in the course of the investigation he has to take into consideration the relevant material whether against or in favour of the accused; Mohd Jainal Aladin v State of Assam, (1997)2 Crimes 660 (Gau)

(iii) Where the investigating officer had deliberately failed to record the FIR and prepared it after reaching the spot after due deliberations, the investigation is tainted and it would be unsafe to rely on such tainted investigation; Mantram v State of Madhya Pradesh, (1997) 2 Crimes 550 (MP)

(iv) Recording of statement of injured cannot be held to be admissible in Evidence Act under section 32; Sukhas v State of Uttar Pradesh, 2000 Cr LJ 29 (SC)

(v) Court while using a previous statement recorded under section 161 Cr P, should bear in mind the restrictions imposed under section 162 of Cr P; State of Kerala v Babu, 1999 AIR (SC) 2161: 1999 (4) SCC 621: 1999(3) JT 394: 1999 (3) Crimes 27 (SC)

(vi) Court's failure to put any question on reference to statement under section 161, advance impression cannot be drawn by Court; Dandu Laxmi Reddy v State of Andhra Pradesh, 1999 AIR (SC) 3255: 1999 (7) SCC 69: 1999 (6) JT 166



View Previous | View Next

Ask your question from lawyers!

Ask anonymously